Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 05/25/2017 05:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After some experimentation, I came up with the attached, which simply
>> skips the "recursive" step if it would apply to the same array type we
>> already moved.
> This looks good to me.
Pushed, thanks for reviewing.
regards, tom lane