Re: Doc of typmod arg perhaps deserves an update

From: Chapman Flack <jcflack(at)acm(dot)org>
To: Steve Lau <stevelauc(at)outlook(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Doc of typmod arg perhaps deserves an update
Date: 2024-10-11 12:42:19
Message-ID: 67091D2B.5080002@acm.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/11/24 01:33, Steve Lau wrote:
> Before hitting the issue, I thought -1 will be passed if and only if
> this type does not have type modifiers, as it is indeed unknown. However,
> it surprises me that it could also be unknown if your type needs
> type modifiers and the type modifiers have been successfully stored

This older thread may be of interest:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/162867790903161317q178e11e6ie276d1254c279dd1%40mail.gmail.com

Regards,
-Chap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joel Jacobson 2024-10-11 13:04:39 Re: Should CSV parsing be stricter about mid-field quotes?
Previous Message John Naylor 2024-10-11 11:43:22 Re: ECPG cleanup and fix for clang compile-time problem