From: | John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Raimon Fernandez <coder(at)montx(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Implementing Frontend/Backend Protocol TCP/IP |
Date: | 2009-10-27 12:40:31 |
Message-ID: | 66F15D69-75E5-4D8E-84F8-2F21E09BBA98@pgedit.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-interfaces |
On Oct 26, 2009, at 7:17 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> yah, seriously. the binary protocol is not considered stable, it
> can change in subtle ways in each version. libpq handles the
> current version and all previous versions, and exposes all methods.
I don't think the frontend/backend protocol has changed since version
7.4. All data can be in text format; you don't have to deal with binary.
I have implemented an interface in Lisp. I found it much easier and
more flexible than the foreign function interface with C and libpq.
John DeSoi, Ph.D.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John DeSoi | 2009-10-27 12:51:39 | Re: Implementing Frontend/Backend Protocol TCP/IP |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2009-10-27 12:21:19 | Re: Invalid Page Header Error |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John DeSoi | 2009-10-27 12:51:39 | Re: Implementing Frontend/Backend Protocol TCP/IP |
Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2009-10-27 10:10:43 | Re: Implementing Frontend/Backend Protocol TCP/IP |