Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time
Date: 2008-11-21 17:10:45
Message-ID: 6667.1227287445@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 08:18 -0800, Ron Mayer wrote:
>> If measured in "bytes of the gzipped mbox" it looks like there's a
>> *huge* increase of volume on Hackers in the past 3 months - well
>> over twice the historical levels; and maybe 4X 2002-2006.

> Its because we eliminated the -patches mailing list.

Yeah, I think this is most probably explained by repeat postings
of successive versions of large patches. Still, Ron might be on to
something. I had not considered message lengths in my previous
numbers ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-11-21 17:12:07 Re: Using Postgres to store high volume streams of sensor readings
Previous Message Martin Pitt 2008-11-21 16:53:43 Packaging problem: using myspell dictionaries for tsearch2