Re: One process per session lack of sharing

From: AMatveev(at)bitec(dot)ru
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: One process per session lack of sharing
Date: 2016-07-15 13:14:16
Message-ID: 666579216.20160715161416@bitec.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi

> This is true, only when data are immutable and in memory. Elsewhere it is false idea.

For case when the server works 24x7 and you need ability to
fix bugs(or update) on the fly in any app code. It's usual.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-07-15 13:30:15 Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2016-07-15 13:07:08 Re: One process per session lack of sharing