Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> writes:
> On 6 April 2011 05:44, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> It looks like the index predicate expression isn't getting the right
>> collation assigned, so predtest.c decides the query doesn't imply the
>> index's predicate. Too tired to look into exactly why right now, but
>> it's clearly bound up in all the recent collation changes.
> Testing it again with very explicit collations, it still has issues:
Yeah, any sort of collation-sensitive operator in an index WHERE clause
was just plain broken. Fixed now.
regards, tom lane