Re: are there any cons to linking libstdc++ with

From: Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: are there any cons to linking libstdc++ with
Date: 2004-11-18 03:17:31
Message-ID: 665403C5735AB956E9B4D706@palle.girgensohn.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Does the same arguments apply for linking with libc_r (pthreads)?

It is needed by plpython, at least on FreeBSD 4.10 (probably all versions).

/Palle

--On onsdag, november 17, 2004 20.49.20 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
wrote:

> Palle Girgensohn <girgen(at)pingpong(dot)net> writes:
>>> Is there a penalty in just leaving
>>> LDFLAGS+= -lstdc++
>>> in the postgresql port Makefile? Bad idea?
>
> Yup. The portability hazards are considerable. I'm a bit surprised the
> postgis guys seem to think it works.
>
> regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-11-18 03:50:39 Re: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already
Previous Message Harry Smith 2004-11-18 03:01:45 Usenet Discussion Proposal