Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, adam(at)labkey(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails
Date: 2024-11-22 20:07:46
Message-ID: 665338.1732306066@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think we'll also want to do something about MyProcPort->database_name

Huh, isn't that getting filled from InitPostgres's out_dbname?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-11-22 20:17:07 Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-11-22 20:06:23 Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails