From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jay Levitt <jay(dot)levitt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Predicates not getting pushed into SQL function? |
Date: | 2011-11-03 18:41:16 |
Message-ID: | 6646.1320345676@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Jay Levitt <jay(dot)levitt(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm confused. I have a now-trivial SQL function that, unrestricted, would
> scan my whole users table. When I paste the body of the function as a
> subquery and restrict it to one row, it only produces one row. When I paste
> the body of the function into a view and restrict it to one row, it produces
> one row. But when I put it in a SQL function... it scans the whole users
> table and then throws the other rows away.
> I thought SQL functions were generally inline-able, push-down-able, etc.
inline-able, yes, but if they're not inlined you don't get any such
thing as pushdown of external conditions into the function body.
A non-inlined function is a black box.
The interesting question here is why the function doesn't get inlined
into the calling query. You got the obvious showstoppers: it has a
SETOF result, it's not volatile, nor strict. The only other possibility
I can see offhand is that there's some sort of result datatype mismatch,
but you've not provided enough info to be sure about that.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-03 18:45:36 | Re: Blocking excessively in FOR UPDATE |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-11-03 18:32:48 | Re: Optimization required for multiple insertions in PostgreSQL |