From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | depesz(at)depesz(dot)com |
Cc: | Patric Bechtel <patric(dot)bechtel(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Regression in 8.3? |
Date: | 2007-11-12 16:26:09 |
Message-ID: | 6645.1194884769@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com> writes:
> on the other hand. while i know and understand why there can't be "="
> operator for text and int, i think that "like" could be readded as it is
> really clear about how it works.
Really?
regression=# select '8.12345678901234567890' ~~ '%67890' ;
?column?
----------
t
(1 row)
regression=# select '8.12345678901234567890'::numeric ~~ '%67890' ;
?column?
----------
t
(1 row)
regression=# select '8.12345678901234567890'::float8 ~~ '%67890' ;
?column?
----------
f
(1 row)
regression=# select '8.12345678901234567890'::char(50) ~~ '%67890' ;
?column?
----------
f
(1 row)
Yup, the behavior of LIKE before 8.3 was just as datatype-independent
as could be.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erwin Moller | 2007-11-12 16:27:38 | Strange error while working with derived table |
Previous Message | Reg Me Please | 2007-11-12 16:25:59 | Re: Filter tables |