Re: @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk, justin(at)postgresql(dot)org, chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au, vev(at)michvhf(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001: Buffer overflow in
Date: 2002-08-20 15:13:38
Message-ID: 6637.1029856418@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> Anyone see something I missed? Tatsuo, what exactly should the function
>> signature really be for all those encoding conversion functions you just
>> added?

> test=# \df iso8859_1_to_utf8
> List of functions
> Result data type | Schema | Name | Argument data types
> ------------------+------------+-------------------+---------------------------------
> integer | pg_catalog | iso8859_1_to_utf8 | integer, integer, -, -, integer

Right, that's what they are now, but what do the "-" entries really
mean? Also, are the "integer" args and result truthful, or do they
really mean something else?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 2002-08-20 15:21:56 Re: bison news
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-20 15:10:01 Re: bison news