From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, jw <jw(at)sduept(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: abstime bug |
Date: | 2005-07-22 16:44:31 |
Message-ID: | 6623.1122050671@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Michael Fuhr wrote:
>> I'd guess this is due to the 32-bitness of abstime. Those timestamps
>> are around the min and max values of a 32-bit timestamp based on the
>> traditional Unix epoch.
> Yea, I see the same thing in 8.0.X. I don't think abstime should be
> used in that date range, timestamp is a better solution.
It's still a bug though; if the value is out of range, abstimein should
reject it, not misconvert it.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2005-07-22 18:53:47 | Re: BUG #1780: JDBC driver "setNull" throws for BLOB and CLOB |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-07-22 15:45:15 | Re: BUG #1723: array_cat() bug when passed empty array |