Re: Disabling indexes on a table

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql-admin <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Disabling indexes on a table
Date: 2021-02-19 09:23:36
Message-ID: 66028fd5cc301f5726d759e46903f88f8c18217f.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Thu, 2021-02-18 at 11:24 -0500, John Scalia wrote:
> One of my developers asked me about this, and he suggested running the following update:
>
> UPDATE pg_index SET indisready=false
> WHERE indrelid = (select oid from pg_class where release = ‘his_table’);
>
> I told him it’s never a good idea to update anything in a system catalog by hand,
> but that I would reach out here for a better opinion. Am I correct that he
> shouldn’t try this, or is he OK to do this? His table has approximately 8
> different indexes on it, and those really slow down his bulk loads.
> Usually when I have to get involved, I just drop his indexes and rebuild
> them afterwards, and I know that is always safe.

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/catalog-pg-index.html says:

indisready bool

If true, the index is currently ready for inserts. False means the
index must be ignored by INSERT/UPDATE operations.

So that would indeed speed up a bulk load, but your indexes would be
unusable afterwards. If you run a second update to "pg_index" to
set "indisready" to TRUE, you would end up with corrupted indexes.

The indexes will be useless and can only be dropped. So you are right
that that is not a good idea.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Scalia 2021-02-19 12:10:03 Re: Disabling indexes on a table
Previous Message Holger Jakobs 2021-02-18 21:39:06 Re: Error after Streaming Replication