Re: 9.6.9 Default configuration for a default installation but different with-krb-srvnam

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Jean-Philippe Chenel <jp(dot)chenel(at)LIVE(dot)CA>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 9.6.9 Default configuration for a default installation but different with-krb-srvnam
Date: 2019-04-26 13:29:40
Message-ID: 6601b29f5f0eb3575ea02fe79e81c77010e20259.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 13:18 +0000, Jean-Philippe Chenel wrote:
> 1. So my question is, how can I compile this version of postgresql (9.6.9) and have the same real things
> of the default previously installed version, but with the --with-krb-srvnam=POSTGRES_DEV to change the
> default user name? So one server will have the postgres user and the other one will have postgres_dev user.

You can run

pg_config --configure

to see how PostgreSQL was configured.

> 2. I'm planning to shut down the postgresql service and then replace files generated by the make install
> command. After restarting the service, all will work as expected with the same database objects that were running before?

If you use the same major release and configured it identically on the same architecture, yes.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-04-26 14:11:19 Re: Is _<typename> a supported way to create a column of array type?
Previous Message Jean-Philippe Chenel 2019-04-26 13:18:51 9.6.9 Default configuration for a default installation but different with-krb-srvnam