Remove AIX Support (was: Re: Relation bulk write facility)

From: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Remove AIX Support (was: Re: Relation bulk write facility)
Date: 2024-02-29 08:13:04
Message-ID: 65e03c90.050a0220.77edd.3ba9@mx.google.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 01:29:36PM -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> Let's just drop AIX. This isn't the only alignment issue we've found and the
> solution for those isn't so much a fix as forcing everyone to carefully only
> look into one direction and not notice the cliffs to either side.

While I am not against dropping AIX (and certainly won't step up to
maintain it just for fun), I don't think burying this inside some
"Relation bulk write facility" thread is helpful; I have changed the
thread title as a first step.

The commit message says there is not a lot of user demand and that might
be right, but contrary to other fringe OSes that got removed like HPPA
or Irix, I believe Postgres on AIX is still used in production and if
so, probably in a mission-critical manner at some old-school
institutions (in fact, one of our customers does just that) and not as a
thought-experiment. It is probably well-known among Postgres hackers
that AIX support is problematic/a burden, but the current users might
not be aware of this.

Not sure what to do about this (especially now that this has been
committed), maybe there should have been be a public deprecation notice
first for v17... On the other hand, that might not work if important
features like direct-IO would have to be bumped from v17 just because of
AIX.

I posted about this on Twitter and Mastodon to see whether anybody
complains and did not get a lot of feedback.

In any case, users will have a couple of years to migrate as usual if
they upgrade to v16.

Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Benoit Lobréau 2024-02-29 08:24:20 Re: Logging parallel worker draught
Previous Message jian he 2024-02-29 08:10:26 Re: Propagate sanity checks of ProcessUtility() to standard_ProcessUtility()?