Re: [BUGS] BUG #14657: Server process segmentation fault in v10, May 10th dev snapshot

From: Sveinn Sveinsson <sveinn(dot)sveinsson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14657: Server process segmentation fault in v10, May 10th dev snapshot
Date: 2017-05-18 11:57:59
Message-ID: 65cbe70a-7be4-dad8-ef44-f268c82b579e@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

The patch fixed the problem, thanks a lot.
Regards,
Sveinn.

On fim 18.maí 2017 01:53, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 2017/05/18 10:49, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2017/05/18 2:14, Dilip Kumar wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:41 PM, <sveinn(dot)sveinsson(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> (gdb) bt
>>>> #0 0x000000000061ab1b in list_nth ()
>>>> #1 0x00000000005e4081 in ExecLockNonLeafAppendTables ()
>>>> #2 0x00000000005f4d52 in ExecInitMergeAppend ()
>>>> #3 0x00000000005e0365 in ExecInitNode ()
>>>> #4 0x00000000005f35a7 in ExecInitLimit ()
>>>> #5 0x00000000005e00f3 in ExecInitNode ()
>>>> #6 0x00000000005dd207 in standard_ExecutorStart ()
>>>> #7 0x00000000006f96d2 in PortalStart ()
>>>> #8 0x00000000006f5c7f in exec_simple_query ()
>>>> #9 0x00000000006f6fac in PostgresMain ()
>>>> #10 0x0000000000475cdc in ServerLoop ()
>>>> #11 0x0000000000692ffa in PostmasterMain ()
>>>> #12 0x0000000000476600 in main ()
>> Thanks for the test case Sveinn and thanks Dilip for analyzing.
>>
>>> Seems like the issue is that the plans under multiple subroots are
>>> pointing to the same partitioned_rels.
>> That's correct.
>>
>>> If I am not getting it wrong "set_plan_refs(PlannerInfo *root, Plan
>>> *plan, int rtoffset)" the rtoffset is specific to the subroot. Now,
>>> problem is that set_plan_refs called for different subroot is updating
>>> the same partition_rel info and make this value completely wrong which
>>> will ultimately make ExecLockNonLeafAppendTables to access the out of
>>> bound "rte" index.
>> Yes.
>>
>>> set_plan_refs
>>> {
>>> [clipped]
>>> case T_MergeAppend:
>>> {
>>> [clipped]
>>>
>>> foreach(l, splan->partitioned_rels)
>>> {
>>> lfirst_int(l) += rtoffset;
>>>
>>>
>>> I think the solution should be that create_merge_append_path make the
>>> copy of partitioned_rels list?
>> Yes, partitioned_rels should be copied.
>>
>>> Attached patch fixes the problem but I am not completely sure about the fix.
>> Thanks for creating the patch, although I think a better fix would be to
>> make get_partitioned_child_rels() do the list_copy. That way, any other
>> users of partitioned_rels will not suffer the same issue. Attached patch
>> implements that, along with a regression test.
>>
>> Added to the open items.
> Oops, forgot to cc -hackers. Patch attached again.
>
> Thanks,
> Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-18 13:40:50 Re: BUG #14658: psql set autocommit in command line
Previous Message lindner 2017-05-18 08:31:15 BUG #14658: psql set autocommit in command line

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2017-05-18 13:38:51 Re: transition table behavior with inheritance appears broken (was: Declarative partitioning - another take)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-05-18 11:22:43 Re: UPDATE of partition key