| From: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs |
| Date: | 2024-04-08 15:15:15 |
| Message-ID: | 65cb266f-cfb8-9195-5398-5dcc93bec13e@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
08.04.2024 18:08, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Now that ExecQueryUsingCursor() is gone, it's not clear, what does
>> the following comment mean:?
>> * We must turn off gexec_flag to avoid infinite recursion. Note that
>> * this allows ExecQueryUsingCursor to be applied to the individual query
>> * results.
> Hmm, the point about recursion is still valid isn't it? I agree the
> reference to ExecQueryUsingCursor is obsolete, but I think we need to
> reconstruct what this comment is actually talking about. It's
> certainly pretty obscure ...
Sorry, I wasn't clear enough, I meant to remove only that reference, not
the quoted comment altogether.
Best regards,
Alexander
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-04-08 15:21:41 | Re: PostgreSQL 17 Release Management Team & Feature Freeze |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-04-08 15:08:24 | Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs |