Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log

From: Michael Banck <mbanck(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: Use of backup_label not noted in log
Date: 2024-01-25 13:29:59
Message-ID: 65b26258.170a0220.2dc3d.43ae@mx.google.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 08:56:52AM -0400, David Steele wrote:
> I would still advocate for a back patch here. It is frustrating to get logs
> from users that just say:
>
> LOG: invalid checkpoint record
> PANIC: could not locate a valid checkpoint record
>
> It would be very helpful to know what the checkpoint record LSN was in this
> case.

I agree.

Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2024-01-25 13:31:07 Re: [PATCH] Add native windows on arm64 support
Previous Message Aleksander Alekseev 2024-01-25 13:16:55 Re: Remove unused fields in ReorderBufferTupleBuf