| From: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum |
| Date: | 2025-03-19 09:25:57 |
| Message-ID: | 65F792CD-1B54-4260-AE49-121EFB717363@yandex-team.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 18 Mar 2025, at 23:21, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I actually think you could do the test with one injection point and
> just wait on it twice
I was not sure we can safely wake up on injection point and stop and the same point on next iteration.
But, apparently, it is safe, due to wait_counts in InjectionPointSharedState.
So, yes, your change to the test seems correct to me. We can do the test with just one injection point.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | vignesh C | 2025-03-19 09:44:48 | Re: Adding a '--clean-publisher-objects' option to 'pg_createsubscriber' utility. |
| Previous Message | Ilia Evdokimov | 2025-03-19 09:16:01 | Re: Add missing tab completion for VACUUM and ANALYZE with ONLY option |