| From: | Philip Semanchuk <philip(at)americanefficient(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Roman Cervenak <roman(at)cervenak(dot)info>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: IN clause behaving badly with missing comma and line break |
| Date: | 2023-01-18 16:09:38 |
| Message-ID: | 65C07914-4AB4-43F5-BC5B-E73F1FE99185@americanefficient.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> On Jan 18, 2023, at 11:06 AM, Francisco Olarte <folarte(at)peoplecall(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2023 at 16:21, Philip Semanchuk
> <philip(at)americanefficient(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> .... We’ve adopted a formatting standard that helps us to avoid surprises due to missing commas. We put one string literal on each line and place the commas all in the same column with a significant amount of white space to the left of the commas. With this safeguard in place, it’s very easy to spot a missing comma.
>>
>> WHERE t IN ('a' ,
>> 'foo' ,
>> 'bar' ,
>> )
>
> I believe that one is a syntax error ( last comma ).
Ooops, yes, thanks for catching that. I spend about half of my time in Python where that trailing comma is acceptable and idiomatic. Not so much in SQL. :-)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sam.Mesh | 2023-01-18 21:43:43 | Re: index not used for bigint without explicit cast |
| Previous Message | Francisco Olarte | 2023-01-18 16:06:21 | Re: IN clause behaving badly with missing comma and line break |