| From: | Matt Magoffin <postgresql(dot)org(at)msqr(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Duplicate key violation on upsert |
| Date: | 2020-03-26 00:23:49 |
| Message-ID: | 65AECD9A-CE13-4FCB-9158-23BE62BB65DD@msqr.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> On 23/03/2020, at 1:10 PM, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> wrote:
>
> So the query is in the function solardatum.store_datum()?
>
> If so what is it doing?
Yes. This function first performs the INSERT INTO the solardatum.da_datum table that we’re discussing here; then it inserts into two different tables. If it helps, the actual SQL is available here:
> And could you capture the values and pass them to a RAISE NOTICE?
It would take me some time to get that change deployed. If I was able to, what information do you think would be helpful here, e.g. that jdata_a is NULL or not, or something else?
The duplicate key violation occurs infrequently, and it does seem appropriate to drop the UNIQUE constraint on the da_datum_x_acc_idx given uniqueness is really only wanted on (node_id, ts, source_id). As long as I can confirm that query performance doesn’t decrease, I’d like to recreate the index without UNIQUE. Then I’m hoping this problem, whatever the cause, goes away.
— m@
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-03-26 00:50:13 | Re: PostgreSQL 13: native JavaScript Procedural Language support ? |
| Previous Message | Chris Morris | 2020-03-25 17:38:29 | Re: PG 12: Partitioning across a FDW? |