From: | "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | brian <brian(at)zijn-digital(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Function returning subset of columns from table (return type) |
Date: | 2008-02-04 00:37:21 |
Message-ID: | 65937bea0802031637n2887319jc1e4ca159e61ad0@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Feb 3, 2008 3:23 PM, brian <brian(at)zijn-digital(dot)com> wrote:
> CREATE TYPE your_type
> AS (
> added CHAR(11) NOT NULL,
> updated CHAR(11) NOT NULL,
> text_col TEXT
> );
>
> CREATE FUNCTION get_note(id INT)
> RETURNS SETOF your_type IMMUTABLE
> AS $$
>
> DECLARE
> your_row your_type%rowtype;
>
> BEGIN
> SELECT INTO your_row
> to_char(added, 'Mon D YYYY'),
> to_char(updated, 'Mon D YYYY'),
> text_col
> FROM note
> WHERE id = $1;
>
> RETURN your_row;
> END;
> $$ LANGUAGE sql;
>
>
All's okay, except you should not have declared it IMMUTABLE, because the
results depend on a database query.
From the docs:
IMMUTABLE indicates that the function cannot modify the database and always
returns the same result when given the same argument values; that is, it does
not do database lookups or otherwise use information not directly present in
its argument list
Best regards,
--
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
17° 29' 34.37"N, 78° 30' 59.76"E - Hyderabad
18° 32' 57.25"N, 73° 56' 25.42"E - Pune
37° 47' 19.72"N, 122° 24' 1.69" W - San Francisco *
Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2008-02-04 00:51:55 | Re: postgresql book - practical or something newer? |
Previous Message | Jean-Paul Argudo | 2008-02-04 00:14:23 | Re: PostgreSQL Certification |