From: | "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Added the word TODO in comments |
Date: | 2007-01-01 07:24:52 |
Message-ID: | 65937bea0612312324i1d5044edg67e13ced75baac4a@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
The comment, "This should be improved someday" sure sounds like a TODO to
me.
I don't know if it should make it to the TODO doc, as that lists
high-level/abstract feature-request-like items.
Probably I should stop acting on impulse here. Hey, can someone around here
lend me his rock!! ( no offence intended :)
Best wishes to all in the new year...
Best regards,
--
gurjeet[(dot)singh](at)EnterpriseDB(dot)com
singh(dot)gurjeet(at){ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com
On 12/31/06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > This just so that somebody looking for TODO items in the source can find
> > this one too.
>
> If you're looking for TODO items, why wouldn't you be looking in the
> TODO document?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2007-01-01 14:26:14 | Request for review: tsearch2 patch |
Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2007-01-01 07:13:10 | Re: A possible TODO item |