| From: | "James Hall" <James(dot)Hall(at)RadioShack(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bob Powell" <Bob(at)hotchkiss(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgress and MYSQL |
| Date: | 2004-01-13 19:05:43 |
| Message-ID: | 657F6CD64C877A4DB860A224E9E3E8501B3647@ntmailp.tandy.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I cannot answer your question directly, but I did come across this
mysql/postgresql article this morning...
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=1817&e=10&u=/zd/2004011
1/tc_zd/116115&sid=96120751
I'm sure it's already been posted to the list.
-jim
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Powell [mailto:Bob(at)hotchkiss(dot)org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:32 AM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [GENERAL] Postgress and MYSQL
To whom it may concern:
I find the recent articles in various trade publications a little
disturbing due to the lack of PostgrSQL mention. I continue to see
articles about how IBM may be considering MYSQL for development an
open_source web database.
Why isn't PostgreSQL being considered or talked about by major industry
giants? As a DBA I know that Postgres is far superior to MYSQL but if
the industry directs it's energies towards open-source database this
coming year I think somehow PostgreSQL needs to be represented better.
Bob Powell
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel E. Fisher | 2004-01-13 19:08:14 | Error since powerouttage |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-01-13 18:53:31 | Re: sql insert function |