Re: Add IS (NOT) DISTINCT to subquery_Op

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add IS (NOT) DISTINCT to subquery_Op
Date: 2015-12-11 01:03:49
Message-ID: 656.1449795829@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> writes:
> Is there any reason we couldn't/shouldn't support IS DISTINCT in
> subquery_Op? (Or really, just add support to ANY()/ALL()/(SELECT ...)?)

It's not an operator (in the sense of something with a pg_operator OID),
which means this would be quite a bit less than trivial as far as internal
representation/implementation goes. I'm not sure if there would be
grammar issues, either.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-12-11 01:09:40 Re: Fwd: [GENERAL] pgxs/config/missing is... missing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-12-11 00:54:28 Re: [sqlsmith] Failed to generate plan on lateral subqueries