| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> | 
| Cc: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com> | 
| Subject: | Re: SECURITY LABEL on shared database object | 
| Date: | 2011-07-01 22:24:25 | 
| Message-ID: | 6554.1309559065@sss.pgh.pa.us | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> writes:
> The origin of matter is, as you mentioned, collation to be used for system
> catalog scan when we reference it via syscache.
> So, the following chunk should be added, as I did in the userspace access
> vector patch - part.1.
>   @@ -934,8 +935,7 @@ CatalogCacheInitializeCache(CatCache *cache)
>           /* Fill in sk_strategy as well --- always standard equality */
>           cache->cc_skey[i].sk_strategy = BTEqualStrategyNumber;
>           cache->cc_skey[i].sk_subtype = InvalidOid;
>   -       /* Currently, there are no catcaches on collation-aware data types */
>   -       cache->cc_skey[i].sk_collation = InvalidOid;
>   +       cache->cc_skey[i].sk_collation = DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID;
I removed such a hunk from a previous patch of yours, and I don't like
it any better this time.  This is just a hack that will result in
masking bugs.
Consider using a non-collation-aware datatype instead, such as NAME.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-01 22:27:53 | Re: default privileges wording | 
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-01 22:20:50 | Re: avoid including rel.h in execnodes.h |