Re: [REVIEW] prepare plans of embedded sql on function start

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] prepare plans of embedded sql on function start
Date: 2011-09-12 14:31:23
Message-ID: 6547.1315837883@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I started work on proposed check statement option and there are a few questions?

> what is sense of this statement for others PL?

IMO you should design this as a call to the PL's validator function.
It's not necessary to make other PLs do anything more than their
existing validators do (at least for now).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-09-12 14:37:35 Re: Patch to improve reliability of postgresql on linux nfs
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-09-12 14:30:21 Re: Alpha 1 for 9.2