From: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | MARK CALLAGHAN <mdcallag(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: benchmark results comparing versions 15.2 and 16 |
Date: | 2023-07-07 13:00:01 |
Message-ID: | 65377ba9-dd24-e4c8-83a3-60cba8b22bf6@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello David,
11.05.2023 16:00, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> Yeah, I see. It's also interesting to me, which tests perform better after
> that commit. It takes several hours to run all tests, so I can't present
> results quickly, but I'll try to collect this information next week.
To my regret, I could not find such tests that week, so I decided to try
later, after reviewing my benchmark running infrastructure.
But for now, as Postgres Pro company graciously shared the benchmarking
infrastructure project [1], it's possible for anyone to confirm or deny my
results. (You can also see which tests were performed and how.)
Having done one more round of comprehensive testing, I still couldn't find
winning tests for commit 3c6fc5820 (but reassured that
test s64da_tpcds.query87 loses a little (and also s64da_tpcds.query38)).
So it seems to me that the tests I performed or their parameters is not
representative enough for that improvement, unfortunately.
[1] https://github.com/postgrespro/pg-mark
Best regards,
Alexander
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ranier Vilela | 2023-07-07 13:11:39 | Standardize type of variable when extending Buffers |
Previous Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2023-07-07 12:54:53 | RE: [Patch] Use *other* indexes on the subscriber when REPLICA IDENTITY is FULL |