From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Rod Taylor <rbt(at)zort(dot)ca>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN |
Date: | 2002-07-05 00:15:31 |
Message-ID: | 6536.1025828131@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Even if we could do it, we would be feeding clients attno
> values that are inaccurate, causing problems when attno is joined to
> other tables.
Good point; we'd need similar views replacing pg_attrdef and probably
other places. Messy indeed :-(
But as Dave already pointed out, it's probably pointless to worry.
The schema support in 7.3 will already de-facto break nearly every
client that inspects the system catalogs, so adding some more work
for DROP COLUMN support isn't going to make much difference.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-07-05 00:52:37 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-07-05 00:03:43 | Re: BETWEEN Node & DROP COLUMN |