From: | <btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | <btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com>, <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Conservation of OIDs |
Date: | 2003-11-16 01:50:02 |
Message-ID: | 65275.66.212.203.144.1068947402.squirrel@$HOSTNAME |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> Whoa! You mean these aren't already separate database clusters or even
> separate systems? I am very shocked, you can't do a proper Dev --> QAT
> --> Prod environment if all three systems are run by the same
> postmaster, or on the same host imo.
I can see having separate clusters would save me the unnecessary
expenditure of OID',s, and I can see access to the production data being
restricted (from developers?) in most cases as a good thing, but for this
environment the set of end-users and developers is actually quite small,
they are in close proximity and have ready communication, and so I don't
see why it would be a problem to have the same postmaster running all
three databases for this case. I would be interested in hearing more
detail as to why it is a bad idea in general.
~Berend Tober
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2003-11-16 01:52:00 | Re: how to find version? |
Previous Message | bpalmer | 2003-11-16 01:44:20 | Re: how to find version? |