Re: Conservation of OIDs

From: <btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com>
To: <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: <btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com>, <mkoi-pg(at)aon(dot)at>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Conservation of OIDs
Date: 2003-11-16 01:50:02
Message-ID: 65275.66.212.203.144.1068947402.squirrel@$HOSTNAME
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Whoa! You mean these aren't already separate database clusters or even
> separate systems? I am very shocked, you can't do a proper Dev --> QAT
> --> Prod environment if all three systems are run by the same
> postmaster, or on the same host imo.

I can see having separate clusters would save me the unnecessary
expenditure of OID',s, and I can see access to the production data being
restricted (from developers?) in most cases as a good thing, but for this
environment the set of end-users and developers is actually quite small,
they are in close proximity and have ready communication, and so I don't
see why it would be a problem to have the same postmaster running all
three databases for this case. I would be interested in hearing more
detail as to why it is a bad idea in general.

~Berend Tober

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2003-11-16 01:52:00 Re: how to find version?
Previous Message bpalmer 2003-11-16 01:44:20 Re: how to find version?