Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me

From: Greg Stark <greg(dot)stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andy Lester <andy(at)petdance(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me
Date: 2009-05-01 23:44:00
Message-ID: 65273820-F3D7-4A5E-8391-1FB492E2A136@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--
Greg

On 1 May 2009, at 21:09, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:

> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 11:23:24AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> We had a similar thing for awhile with the .sgml files, and got rid
>> of
>> that because it sucked ...
>
> I'd appreciate your making an argument, if you're going to, on the
> merits of the proposal at hand, rather than stooping to personal
> insult.

Eh? The reply was terse but it's not a personal insult to say we've
tried the suggestion before and decided it was a bad idea.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-05-02 00:57:40 Re: Throw some low-level C scutwork at me
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-05-01 23:05:46 Re: windows shared memory error