Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)
Date: 2003-09-27 17:33:16
Message-ID: 6527.1064683996@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Jon Jensen writes:
>> I hate to mention it, but would it be useful/non-overkill to make either
>> of those things (context message maximum length and funny character
>> escaping) configurable somehow?

> I'm thinking the same. We have conflicting needs of different groups:
> Users on "real" Unix platforms converting old data need the checks, users
> on Windows platforms with new data don't want them. (I wonder what people
> on Mac OS that mix Unix-style and native applications would want.)

I wouldn't object to adding a GUC variable that turns off the
mixed-newlines error (as long as it defaults to enabled ;-)).

Our intention to remove the check in the future might then reduce
to simply flipping the factory default for this variable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-27 17:40:40 Re: Is it safe to use DEFAULT currval()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-27 17:26:26 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-27 17:34:39 Re: pg_dump doesn't dump binary compatible casts
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-27 17:26:26 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Germán Gazzoni 2003-09-27 18:04:53 Tomcat - PostgreSQL - Perfomance Tunning
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-27 17:26:26 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)