From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Date: | 2003-09-27 17:33:16 |
Message-ID: | 6527.1064683996@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Jon Jensen writes:
>> I hate to mention it, but would it be useful/non-overkill to make either
>> of those things (context message maximum length and funny character
>> escaping) configurable somehow?
> I'm thinking the same. We have conflicting needs of different groups:
> Users on "real" Unix platforms converting old data need the checks, users
> on Windows platforms with new data don't want them. (I wonder what people
> on Mac OS that mix Unix-style and native applications would want.)
I wouldn't object to adding a GUC variable that turns off the
mixed-newlines error (as long as it defaults to enabled ;-)).
Our intention to remove the check in the future might then reduce
to simply flipping the factory default for this variable.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-27 17:40:40 | Re: Is it safe to use DEFAULT currval() |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-27 17:26:26 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-27 17:34:39 | Re: pg_dump doesn't dump binary compatible casts |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-27 17:26:26 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Germán Gazzoni | 2003-09-27 18:04:53 | Tomcat - PostgreSQL - Perfomance Tunning |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-27 17:26:26 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |