Re: Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Brent Dearth <brent(dot)dearth(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra
Date: 2017-10-02 23:50:51
Message-ID: 6507.1506988251@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2017-10-02 18:33:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm kind of surprised that machine B doesn't show obvious tanking in this
>> test given that msync() makes it suck so badly at copying a database.
>> I wonder what is different from the kernel's standpoint ... maybe the
>> sheer number of different files mmap'd by a single process during the
>> copy?

> Yea, that's curious. I've really no clue about OSX, so pardon my
> question: With HEAD and CREATE DATABASE, is it IO blocked or kernel cpu
> blocked?

What I saw was that the backend process was consuming 100% of (one) CPU,
while the I/O transaction rate viewed by "iostat 1" started pretty low
--- under 10% of what the machine is capable of --- and dropped from
there as the copy proceeded. I did not think to check if that was user
or kernel-space CPU, but I imagine it has to be the latter.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-10-02 23:55:26 Re: Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-10-02 23:41:34 Re: [BUG] Cache invalidation for queries that contains const of temporary composite type