Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, "August Zajonc" <augustz(at)augustz(dot)com>, "Postgresql-Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lazy xid assingment V2
Date: 2007-09-02 14:25:12
Message-ID: 6504.1188743112@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Someone just mentioned doing the same
>> thing but pushing the unreferenced files into a "trash" directory
>> instead of actually deleting them.

> That sounds like a good idea to me.

It suddenly strikes me that there's lots of precedent for it: fsck moves
unreferenced files into lost+found, instead of just deleting them.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-09-02 14:29:08 Re: \dF wrt text search
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-09-02 14:05:08 Re: \dF wrt text search