Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes

From: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alena Rybakina <a(dot)rybakina(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Shaplov <dhyan(at)nataraj(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Marcos Pegoraro <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Subject: Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Date: 2024-11-29 05:10:42
Message-ID: 64fedbf3-b0aa-444a-a5b1-4cc61a09e4f0@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/29/24 07:04, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 9:33 PM Alena Rybakina
> I slightly revised the fix and added similar check to
> group_similar_or_args(). Could you, please, review that before
> commit?
LGTM,
As I see, we didn't pay attention to this option from the beginning.
Thanks for fixing it!

--
regards, Andrei Lepikhov

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-11-29 05:37:48 Re: Converting SetOp to read its two inputs separately
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2024-11-29 05:06:36 Re: Strange assertion in procarray.c