From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Ameen Abbas <abbas(dot)dba(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: oldest xmin is far in the past: PG 11 |
Date: | 2020-01-22 10:33:33 |
Message-ID: | 64f723e621f1f199441a1b9ee6d0c331926c1115.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Wed, 2020-01-22 at 13:31 +0530, Ameen Abbas wrote:
> We are facing "oldest xmin is far in the past" in PostgreSQL 11 in logs, and we don't have
> any halted/aborted open transactions, and even no replication slots and no prepared transactions,
> we had ran vacuum verbose on the db multiple times still the below warning message not gone.
Ok, there are no prepared transactions and no replication slots.
Check for old transactions:
SELECT pid, age(current_timestamp, xact_start)
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE state <> 'idle';
Also, are there standby servers with "hot_standby_feedback = on"?
They might have a long running transaction as well.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | srikkanth | 2020-01-22 11:00:45 | SQL Query Syntax help |
Previous Message | Ameen Abbas | 2020-01-22 08:01:29 | oldest xmin is far in the past: PG 11 |