Re: JSON for PG 9.2

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, Peter van Hardenberg <pvh(at)pvh(dot)ca>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date: 2011-12-13 18:05:57
Message-ID: 64DEC5D2-8AC3-4E30-B199-B1D330EC94FB@justatheory.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Dec 12, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> I remember there was the idea of doing something like this for regexes
> -- have a specialized data type that saves the trouble of parsing it.
> I imagine this is pretty much the same.
>
> Nobody got around to doing anything about it though.

(regex data type)++

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2011-12-13 18:13:03 Re: patch for type privileges
Previous Message Greg Smith 2011-12-13 17:58:05 Re: Command Triggers