Christof Petig <christof(at)petig-baender(dot)de> writes:
> IIRC the list of descriptor types is terminated by ECPGd_EODT. So the new
> library can't figure out where the old code's argument stop.
> Fix: put ECPGd_cardinality behind ECPGd_EODT.
> I reordered them because of logical considerations, maybe we should weight
> binary compatibility more than beautiful-sortedness of enum values.
Is that a safe fix? If there are any places that assume that ECPGd_EODT
is the largest value of this enum type (eg, for sizing arrays) then
I think you've got a problem.
regards, tom lane