| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
| Date: | 2003-09-12 04:06:49 |
| Message-ID: | 6487.1063339609@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> I've already sent a whine-a-gram to the compiler guys at SCO.
Prolly you thought of this already, but: getting them to *add*
an implicit #define of __i386__ should be plenty easy compared
to getting them to *remove* the one for i386. And while I think
they should remove the latter, the immediate problem would be
solved as soon as they add the former.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-12 04:07:14 | Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-09-12 04:02:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-09-12 04:07:14 | Re: Reorganization of spinlock defines |
| Previous Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-09-12 04:02:02 | Re: [HACKERS] Reorganization of spinlock defines |