From: | "Larry Rosenman" <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Andreas Joseph Krogh" <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
Date: | 2010-01-22 00:09:30 |
Message-ID: | 647f377d61a41957c9cbff32d3fee8b8.squirrel@webmail.lerctr.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, January 21, 2010 5:53 pm, Andreas Joseph Krogh wrote:
> On Thursday 21. January 2010 10.37.41 Dave Page wrote:
>> In an attempt to pre-empt the normally drawn-out discussions about
>> what the next version of PostgreSQL will be numbered. the core team
>> have discussed the issue and following a lenghty debate lasting
>> literally a few minutes decided that the next release shall be....
>>
>> Wait for it....
>>
>> 9.0.
>
> Care to shed some light on what features (yes, we users care about
> features) warrant this major version-bump? Is there a link somewhere?
AFAIR, it was stated if Hot Standby AND Streaming Replication hit the
tree, the release number would go to 9.0.
Both are in the tree.
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-22 00:22:09 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
Previous Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2010-01-21 23:53:21 | Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-22 00:11:10 | Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message) |
Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-01-21 23:55:06 | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |