Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types
Date: 2008-07-30 18:27:34
Message-ID: 64792473-E306-414E-B66E-622D333D7ADC@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:42, David E. Wheeler wrote:

>> I've committed changes along this line. Please look at CVS HEAD and
>> re-evaluate which alias functions/operators you still really need.
>
> Okay, I'll hunt down some tuits today to hack on that.

The ones you removed all seem to be fine. I'll have to re-evaluate all
the one's I've been adding, though. I expect I'll still have to
replace those that need to behave differently (i.e., case-
insensitively) than text.

Best,

David

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-07-30 19:50:13 Should creating a new base type require superuser status?
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2008-07-30 18:26:17 Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types