| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Riaan Stander <rstander(at)exa(dot)co(dot)za>, "pgsql-performa(dot)" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bulk persistence strategy |
| Date: | 2017-05-22 11:50:15 |
| Message-ID: | 64473.1495453815@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> It sounds like you don't know about anonymous code blocks with DO
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/sql-do.html
No, the problem was that there are also some parameters to be passed
in from the application, and DO doesn't take any parameters; so that
would require inserting them manually into the DO text, with all the
attendant hazards of getting-it-wrong.
We've speculated before about letting DO grow some parameter handling,
but it's not gotten to the top of anyone's to-do list.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ariel | 2017-05-22 15:17:31 | index of only not null, use function index? |
| Previous Message | Riaan Stander | 2017-05-22 09:36:01 | Re: Bulk persistence strategy |