Re: Question on Opteron performance

From: Christopher Petrilli <petrilli(at)amber(dot)org>
To: "Steve Wolfe" <nw(at)codon(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Question on Opteron performance
Date: 2004-03-10 21:32:11
Message-ID: 6439E458-72DA-11D8-8B07-003065E15634@amber.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mar 10, 2004, at 3:14 PM, Steve Wolfe wrote:

> Before I shell out the $15k on the 4-way Opteron, I'm going to spend
> some long, hard time looking for ways to make the system more
> efficient.
> However, after all that's already been done, I'm not optimistic that
> it's
> going to preclude needing the new server. I'm just surprised that
> nobody
> seems to have used PostgreSQL on a quad-Opteron before!

Well, I haven't had a chance to run PostgreSQL on a quad-Opteron box,
but in discussing this with someone building a cluster out of them,
their experience is that they are seeing better performance out of a
quad-Opteron than a 3Ghz Xeon box (quad as well), which they believe
reflects superior memory architecture. So, if someone has run on a
quad-Xeon of similar "specs", then I would imagine you should see
similar, if not better, numbers.

Chris
--
| Christopher Petrilli
| petrilli (at) amber.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-03-10 21:50:25 Re: returning row numbers in select
Previous Message Randall Skelton 2004-03-10 21:23:17 Re: returning row numbers in select