| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas T(dot) Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>, Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>, Arrigo Triulzi <arrigo(at)albourne(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?] |
| Date: | 2000-12-31 04:21:04 |
| Message-ID: | 6434.978236464@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
"Thomas T. Thai" <tom(at)minnesota(dot)com> writes:
>> Uh, why are you altering NS32K code in an Alpha patch? I did not apply
>> this.
> cause egcs on NetBSD/Alpha will give lots of error during compile. we
> don't have gcc 2.95.2 on the alpha working yet.
But the proposed diff is inside #if defined(NEED_NS32K_TAS_ASM).
How can that affect an Alpha compilation at all?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-12-31 11:18:59 | Re: Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?] |
| Previous Message | Thomas T. Thai | 2000-12-31 04:17:29 | Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?] |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | GH | 2000-12-31 05:23:12 | Re: how to show foreign keys of a table |
| Previous Message | Thomas T. Thai | 2000-12-31 04:17:29 | Re: NetBSD/Alpha and rkirkpat's patch [was Re: regress failed tests.. SERIOUS?] |