Quick Links

Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file

From:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To:	Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc:	Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file
Date:	2007-10-17 15:27:10
Message-ID:	6430.1192634830@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> There's legitimate use for creating a role with NOLOGIN and a password.

If we think that, then we shouldn't have a message at all.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file at 2007-10-17 15:15:05 from Heikki Linnakangas

Responses

Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file at 2007-10-17 15:35:41 from Stephen Frost
Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file at 2007-10-17 16:41:00 from Magnus Hagander

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Stephen Frost	2007-10-17 15:35:41	Re: rolcanlogin vs. the flat password file
Previous Message	Tom Lane	2007-10-17 15:24:50	Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Re-allow UTF8 encodings on win32.