Re: Feature request -- Log Database Name

From: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature request -- Log Database Name
Date: 2003-07-23 20:22:49
Message-ID: 64120000.1058991769@lerlaptop-red.iadfw.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On Wednesday, July 23, 2003 16:20:20 -0400 Robert Treat
<xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:

>
> Should it be a GUC like log_timestamp that can be applied to all log
> messages?
IMHO, Yes, and it probably can be localized to elog(), although I haven't
looked
at the current elog() function code since 7.0 when I futzed with the
syslog() code.

the question is:

Is this a feature change, or a bug fix given the error reporting change for
7.4?

--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler(at)lerctr(dot)org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-23 20:32:56 Re: Feature request -- Log Database Name
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-23 20:22:17 Re: Feature request -- Log Database Name