From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Cc: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, heath(dot)lord(at)crunchydata(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #17625: In PG15 PQsslAttribute returns different values than PG14 when SSL is not in use for the connection |
Date: | 2022-09-30 14:29:47 |
Message-ID: | 640451.1664548187@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> On 29 Sep 2022, at 23:58, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> - Returns an array of SSL attribute names available.
>> + Returns an array of SSL attribute names that can be used
>> + in <function>PQsslAttribute()</function>.
> Maybe hairsplitting, but should we note that it can be used in PQsslAttribute()
> for the conn which was passed as param to PQsslAttributeNames()? In a (still
> hypothetical) multi-library case there is no guarantee that it will be valid
> for another conn.
I thought about doing this, but the subsequent para seems to make it clear
enough:
+ <para>
+ If <literal>conn</literal> is NULL, the attributes available for the
+ default SSL library are returned, or an empty list
+ if <application>libpq</application> was compiled without any SSL
+ support. If <literal>conn</literal> is not NULL, the attributes
+ available for the SSL library in use for the connection are returned,
+ or an empty list if the connection is not encrypted.
+ </para>
The actual constraint is "names that can be used on connections using
the same SSL library", which seems too verbose for the introductory
sentence.
> I'd be fine just doing this in HEAD.
Pushed to HEAD only.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shane Plesner | 2022-10-01 15:18:41 | Bug / Unintentional Feature: non-immutable functions can be used for generated columns. |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2022-09-30 06:33:40 | Re: BUG #17619: AllocSizeIsValid violation in parallel hash join |