Re: Fix to increment the index scan counter for the bloom filter index

From: Masahiro Ikeda <ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix to increment the index scan counter for the bloom filter index
Date: 2024-11-13 00:45:04
Message-ID: 63b9f86eedc50cadc4cb8940332fd889@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024-11-13 06:23, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 5:01 AM Masahiro Ikeda
> <ikedamsh(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>> I noticed that the bloom filter index forgets to increment the index
>> scan counter
>> while reviewing the skip scan patch [1]. It seems this was simply
>> overlooked in
>> the implementation. What do you think?
>
> I think that you're right.
>
> I'll commit this and backpatch once the release tags for the pending
> set of point releases are pushed.

OK, thanks.

Regards,
--
Masahiro Ikeda
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2024-11-13 00:51:23 Re: define pg_structiszero(addr, s, r)
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-11-13 00:34:55 Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication