Re: No checksums please

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No checksums please
Date: 2007-02-06 16:49:28
Message-ID: 63a8efc0d2de25aaefb01c33f863c89f@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

> I don't know if there is a difference between "duplicate detection" and
> "partial duplicate detection". AFAIK, only the "partial duplicate
> detection" has caused problems. But just ignore that ocmment if they are
> the same thing.

Most of the moderated posts in the queue (e.g. -announce) seem to have
all three types of checksums:

Duplicate Message-ID
Duplicate Message Checksum
Duplicate Partial Message Checksum

It's fairly frustrating - for example, the recent post from Pavel Golub
was approved by me this morning, and a few minutes later there were
five separate messages in the queue with this message and all three
duplicate warnings on each of them. I've left them in there in case
others want to take a look.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200702061142
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFFyLCkvJuQZxSWSsgRA27/AKCEvJvFTvM7yaaabJHXbqjlx/SPCACfSF0L
EY1AwU6fRz435R/B2m7gG48=
=qWLn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-06 17:03:34 Re: Majordomo2 (Was: Re: Switching to mailman (Re: [Fwd: NDN: Re: [ODBC]) Connect without queries?])
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-06 16:31:47 Re: Switching to mailman (Re: [Fwd: NDN: Re: [ODBC] Connect without queries?])