Anyone running Intel S3700 SSDs?

From: CSS <css(at)morefoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Anyone running Intel S3700 SSDs?
Date: 2013-03-08 06:48:42
Message-ID: 63CE3313-2627-41B2-9741-7C18BD5BB574@morefoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Considering this list is where I first learned of the Intel 320 drives (AFAIK, the only non-enterprise SSDs that are power-failure safe), I thought I'd see if any of the folks here that tend to test new stuff have got their hands on these yet.

I had no idea these drives were out (but they still are a bit pricey, but cheaper than any spinning drives that would give the same sort of random IO performance), and while trying to find a place to source some spare 300GB 320s, I found this review:

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6433/intel-ssd-dc-s3700-200gb-review

Of most interest to me was this:

"Along one edge of the drive Intel uses two 35V 47µF capacitors, enough to allow the controller to commit any data (and most non-data) to NAND in the event of a power failure. The capacitors in the S3700 are periodically tested by the controller. In the event that they fail, the controller disables all write buffering and throws a SMART error flag."

This is also the first new Intel drive in a long time to use an Intel controller rather than a SandForce (which frankly, I don't trust).

Anyone have any benchmarks to share?

Are there any other sub-$1K drives out there currently that incorporate power loss protection like this and the 320s do?

Thanks,

Charles

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2013-03-08 08:51:22 Re: Anyone running Intel S3700 SSDs?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-03-07 18:47:02 Re: Poor plan when joining against a union containing a join